Church Wedding is not Biblical by Past Abel Damian

 Jesus attended a wedding in Cana,  but it was a feast, a family celebration, not a synagogue service officiated by a priest.

But before you jump on it, ls church wedding biblical or colonial?

Now as a Christian you cannot go home with your husband except you conduct a white wedding if not you have committed  a sin.

This is preposterous! , Many churches conducted  pregnancy test .

After you have married traditionally, no sex or your wedding cancel 

Historically, the white gown became popular after Queen Victoria’s wedding in 1840. It became a fashion statement that later blended into Christian ceremonies, especially in colonized natio

marriage was established.

 “Is Church Wedding Biblical… or Colonial?”

When Abel Damina talks about church weddings, he doesn’t whisper — he drops a bomb.

According to him, the white wedding culture many African Christians practice today is not rooted in Scripture but in Western tradition. 

He argues that the Bible never commanded believers to wear white gowns, walk down aisles, exchange rings before a pastor, or sign certificates in a decorated auditorium.

His point;

Marriage in the Bible was primarily a family and covenant matter, not a church ceremony.

Let’s reason together.

In Genesis 24, Isaac did not have a church wedding. No altar. No choir. No reception hall. 

Rebekah was brought home, and the marriage was established.

In John 2, Jesus attended a wedding in Cana — but it was a feast, a family celebration, not a synagogue service officiated by a priest.

Even in the New Testament, there is no instruction that marriage must be conducted inside a church building.

So where did the white wedding culture come from?

Historically, the white gown became popular after Queen Victoria’s wedding in 1840. 

It became a fashion statement that later blended into Christian ceremonies, especially in colonized nations.

Now the big question:

Is church wedding wrong?

Not necessarily.

But Damina’s argument challenges the mindset that without church wedding, the marriage is incomplete or less spiritual.

Many couples today do:

Traditional marriage

Court wedding

Church wedding

Three ceremonies. 

Three expenses. One couple already in debt before honeymoon.

Is that biblical obligation… or cultural pressure?

The Bible emphasizes covenant, commitment, and leaving father and mother (Genesis 2:24).

It emphasizes love (Ephesians 5). It emphasizes faithfulness.

It never emphasizes wedding décor.

So the real issue may not be where you marry  but what you understand marriage to be.

Is it a covenant before God and witnesses?

Or a performance for Instagram and aso-ebi competition?

If a couple marries traditionally before families and makes vows sincerely before God, are they less married?

That’s the debate.

Some believe church wedding adds spiritual covering and accountability. Others say God honors covenant, not architecture.

At the end of the day, the question is simple:

Are we following Scripture… or just following culture baptized as Christianity?

Why do you like white wedding than your traditional way of marriage?

Is it the long gown or the ring recital rites?

What exactly is your trigger in white  wedding?


This publisher is not feeling fine for sometime now and needs to go to hospital for treatment. It's an emergency requiring surgery that will cost $4,000 (N6m). Your donation at this critical moment will save his life to continue with the missionary work. God bless you in Jesus name. Unless otherwise advised, your donation will be published here and publicly acknowledged.

Ijuo Okpe, Fidelity Bank 6322461922

Comments